This kind of capability can be called financial overall equipment effectiveness (FOEE),according to David McPhail and Dave Edstrom, the respective CEO and CTO of Ontario-basedMemex Automation. FOEE builds on the standard OEE metric, calculated by multiplying availability, quality, and performance. However, adding the financial dimension helps answer the all-important question of whether the company is making money.
FOEE, McPhail and Edstrom say, is built upon deploying a way to collect the data from manufacturing equipment and the operator input panel and channeling it into a manufacturing execution system (MES) or manufacturing operations management system (MOMS).
Speaking with ThomasNet News, McPhail said, “Manufacturers who embrace this path will produce more product with less effort and cost, thereby boosting their productivity and profitability.”
McPhail and Edstrom stress that FOEE needs to work in real time to quickly show management the financial impacts of decisions on the manufacturing floor. Enabling the necessary real-time functioning requires a shop application programming interface (API) that communicates bi-directionally with enterprise resource plannning (ERP) systems and other data repositories to make the most of data at the machine, workstation, and job levels -- and even at the level of the product or individual part.
For more stories like this visit Industry Market Trends
McPhail and Edstrom characterize such an API as an “adaptor” that can “link all critical production and financial information in real time” and “can be easily modified to talk to everything from a CSV file to a database.”
Generating useful financial analytics depends on solving what McPhail calls “the last meterchallenge,” i.e., the crucial connection between the machine or device and the company’s network. Certainly, such an improvement in financial analytics requires technology tools that can generate the right data and present it in usable form for management. However, it also requires companies to focus on the right kinds of metrics.
Michael Rothschild of Profit Velocity Solutions(PVS) believes that the right metric is not the traditional unit-margin figure, but rather is what he refers to as “profit velocity,” which combines profit per unit with units per hour. Providing this metric to company management allows sales efforts to focus on the products that are truly most profitable, he asserts.
In an interview with ThomasNet News, Rothschild acknowledges that unit margin is a necessary metric but warns that “it is not sufficient to inform decisions.” Said Rothschild, “It’s kind of like taking snapshots when what matters is seeing the whole movie.”
He offers the example of inventory figures that help the business understand the value of raw materials or finished goods on hand. For such purposes, a “snapshot” metric is fine. But ultimately, the company exists to generate profits for its shareholders. “So if I’m the CEO,” said Rothschild, “my question is, ‘In the next quarter, how do we get more money out of the business?’”
Adding the dimension of time allows that kind of question to be answered. “Within a certain upcoming period of time, how do I get more money to flow through the plant and into the treasurer’s office?” he commented. To get that knowledge, he says, you have to multiply “margin per unit by units per hour, which gives you margin per hour.” This way, the business can identify the plants, production lines, machines, and products that are making the most money.
Read More at ThomasNet
This article was originally published on ThomasNet News Industry Market Trends and is reprinted with permission from Thomas Industrial Network. For more stories like this please visit Industry Market Trends.